LinkPost
Login
LinkHub

LinkHub

Attract qualified clients on LinkedIn with your comments

LinkPost

LinkPost

Create viral LinkedIn content, scientifically

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Win unlimited clients through LinkedIn — without spending hours on it.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribute your lead magnets automatically on LinkedIn

LinkPost

© 2026 LinkPost. All rights reserved.

See what others don't.

Features

AI post generatorVirality scoreAI LinkedIn coachMulti-source repurposingMCP integrationAI visualsLinkedIn analyticsContent calendarSpy modeViral inspirations

Free tools

LinkedIn Post AnalyzerLinkedIn Benchmark 2026Engagement Rate CalculatorHook GeneratorHeadline generatorHeadline examplesAbout generatorAbout examplesLinkedIn Profile CheckerViral rules & tacticsSecret AdmirersLinkedIn trends

Resources

BlogPlaybooksMonthly LinkedIn Benchmark

Comparisons

See all comparisonsLinkPost vs TaplioLinkPost vs MagicPostLinkPost vs AuthoredUp

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of Use

LinkPost is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LinkedIn Corporation.

LinkPost

Have a question?

Mathilde is here to help

Hi!

I'm Mathilde from the LinkPost team. How can I help you?

Press Enter to send

Jérôme
Sofiane
Camille
Lucas
Sébastien
LinkPost: 100% 5-star reviews on Trustpilot

LinkPost vs Shield Analytics: Which One Should You Choose in 2026?

Updated May 26, 2026·By Yannis Haismann

Honest comparison on 10 criteria: LinkPost covers 100% of Shield's analytics, goes deeper (sentiment, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU) and adds prediction before publication.

LinkPost captures everything Shield measures, goes deeper (audience sentiment, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU funnel), then predicts what Shield doesn't: which version will hit before you click Publish.

The honest comparison between LinkPost (€99/month, full LinkedIn analytics — every Shield stat + audience sentiment analyzed on 100% of comments, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU funnel mix per post, emotional prediction — plus proprietary virality prediction algorithm, 25-variant scored generation on 300+ factors, Dataset X-Ray on 1M+ posts) and Shield Analytics ($15 → $84/month, retrospective LinkedIn analytics dashboard for creators and ghostwriters). 10 scored criteria, clear verdict based on your profile.

LinkPost captures 100% of the analytics Shield offers (likes, views, engagement rate, follower growth, account comparison), then goes deeper on Shield's own turf: your audience sentiment analyzed on 100% of comments, emotional response prediction before publication, business funnel mix (TOFU/MOFU/BOFU) per post, identification of your real best post (1 user out of 3 discovers it wasn't what they thought), niche benchmark. And beyond analytics, LinkPost adds scoring of 300+ factors BEFORE publication, generation of 25 variants per topic, style learning on 27 personal criteria, Spy Mode that decodes any creator, and the AI Strategist that builds a month of content. Worth noting: Shield remains the simplest tool if your only need is a tidy LinkedIn stats dashboard.

+1M X and LinkedIn posts
Predictive virality scoring
Generates 25 posts, picks the best
Try LinkPost now

"I went from around 12,000 or 13,000 weekly views to over 45,000 — a 4× on my stats in just 15 days."

Thomas Quinet
Thomas QuinetLinkPost user · Trustpilot 5/5
[Quick answer]

The synthesis in 30 seconds

Choose Shield Analytics ($15/month) if all you want is a simple, tidy LinkedIn analytics dashboard, with no generation or prediction. Choose LinkPost (€99/month) if every post matters for your business: LinkPost captures 100% of the analytics Shield offers (likes, views, engagement, followers, account comparison) and goes deeper on Shield's own turf with audience sentiment analyzed on 100% of comments, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU funnel mix per post, and emotional response prediction before publication. And beyond analytics, it adds 25-variant generation scored on 300+ factors before publication, including 27 personalized on your style. Aligned with LinkedIn Engineering's public research (March 2026) ↗. Measured on the 20 most active users: x1.93 likes over 60 days.

Try the free Post Analyzer

[TL;DR · Pick your scenario]

Which one is for you?

For you if
  • You want to know BEFORE publishing what will work
  • You publish to generate leads from content (inbound)
  • You want the most complete and advanced tool on the market
LinkPost
For you if
  • You only want a clean LinkedIn analytics dashboard
  • You write your posts elsewhere (ChatGPT, doc, editor)
  • Your budget is under $20/month
Shield Analytics

[Why one over the other?]

  • Shield advantage: very low entry price ($15/month), clean analytics interface, perfect if your only need is a simple stats dashboard.
  • LinkPost advantage: deeper analytics than Shield on Shield's own turf, plus prediction before publication. x1.93 likes measured over 60 days, +71% posts that hit, -75% flops avoided. Plus AI generation, Spy Mode, AI Strategist, behavioral Dataset X-Ray.

TL;DR

  1. 1Shield Analytics at $15/month is a tidy LinkedIn analytics dashboard. LinkPost at €99/month captures 100% of the analytics Shield offers, goes deeper on the analytics side (audience sentiment, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU mix, emotional prediction), then adds virality prediction before publication trained on 1M+ LinkedIn and X posts.
  2. 2LinkPost generates 25 variants per topic and scores them on 300+ factors (including 27 personalized on your style). Shield doesn't generate content and has no predictive scoring.
  3. 3
[Proof in numbers · Measured ROI]

What about ROI?

x1.93
likes over 60 days
Measured on LinkPost's 20 most active users, before/after
+71%
posts that hit
Across 50,000+ posts tested with the V2 algo
-75%
flops avoided
Weak posts detected before publication

[Cohort · 20 most active LinkPost users]

n=20 · 2026-05-22
Beta cohort raw data
#IDLikes/post beforeLikes/post after×AvgBest post beforeBest post after×Max
1LP-00119.170.2×3.6853248×4.68
2LP-0022.99.7×3.37

A viral B2B LinkedIn post brings 1 to 3 qualified leads on average. Shield Analytics at $15/month gives you a dashboard to measure after the fact. You know what worked, but not why or how to repeat it. LinkPost at €99/month tells you BEFORE publishing which of your 25 variants has the highest probability of hitting. Over 90 days, the ROI of a single successful post pays for 6 months of LinkPost subscription.

Try the free Post Analyzer
[Comparison table · 10 criteria]

Comparison table

LinkPost vs Shield Analytics · comparison over 10 criteria, scored out of 10
Criterion
LinkPost
Shield Analytics
Entry price
6/10

€99/month or €790/year, single plan

9/10

$15/month (Personal), scales with Premium/Business plans

25-variant generation + scoring
10/10

25 angles generated per topic, each scored, you publish the best one

0/10

No content generation, analytics tool only

Virality prediction before publication
9/10

300+ factors analyzed, 27 personal factors learned on your style

0/10

No prediction, retrospective analytics only

LinkedIn Analytics
10/10

Covers 100% of Shield's stats (likes, views, engagement, followers, comparison) + goes deeper: TOFU/MOFU/BOFU funnel mix per post, 100% of comments analyzed (sentiment), emotional response prediction before publication, identification of your real best post

8/10

Solid dashboard: likes, views, engagement rate, follower curves, reporting export. Stays at the surface of classic metrics.

Hooks and measured writing tactics
10/10

33 measured tactics, 7 categories, personal stats, editor integration — public doc linkpost.gg/cheat-sheet

2/10

A few basic recommendations based on past performance

Competitor Spy Mode
9/10

Monitors a creator continuously: controversy, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU mix, POD, top fans, emotional triggers

4/10

External account analytics tracking (aggregated view), no tactical breakdown

AI Strategist (monthly content plan)
9/10

1 month of posts built in 2 clicks, based on your stats + 1M+ posts + real-time news

0/10

Feature does not exist, 100% analytics focus

Scheduling and publishing
9/10

Built-in calendar, publishing via official LinkedIn API, multiple writing profiles

3/10

No native scheduling, some partner integrations

Multi-source (YouTube, podcast, PDF, voice)
9/10

YouTube, podcast, article, PDF, image, voice note, raw thought

0/10

No multi-source generation, analytics tool

Multi-account / client management
7/10

Multiple writing profiles + unified calendar

9/10

Business plans optimized for ghostwriting agencies (aggregated client reporting)

[Breakdown · Feature by feature]

Feature-by-feature breakdown

Retrospective analytics vs prediction before publication

This is the structural gap between the two tools. Shield Analytics is one of the best LinkedIn dashboards on the market: you see your likes, views, engagement rates, follower curves, your best post of the month. All that, after publication. LinkPost does the same on the analytics side (and even deeper with Dataset X-Ray), but adds a layer Shield doesn't offer: scoring BEFORE publication. You write your post, the algorithm scores it on 300+ factors including 27 learned on your past posts (length, hook structure, question density, CTA types, emoji frequency). It also tells you what to fix to increase your probability of hitting. Trained on 1M+ LinkedIn posts and aligned with LinkedIn Engineering's public research ("Engineering the next generation of LinkedIn's Feed", Hristo Danchev, March 12, 2026).

LinkPost wins

Shield measures the past, LinkPost predicts the future. Two different logics, but LinkPost covers both.

25-variant generation + scoring + best-pick

Shield Analytics doesn't generate content, it's strictly a measurement tool. You write your posts elsewhere (ChatGPT, Notion, LinkedIn editor), publish them, then measure in Shield. LinkPost works differently: you give an idea, we generate 25 variants calibrated on different angles (storytelling, controversy, data, expertise, punchy hook, emotional opener). Each variant is then scored on 300+ factors. You see immediately which one has the highest probability of taking off. You publish that one, and then measure in the same tool.

LinkPost wins

25 scored variants vs no generation. The most visible gap between the two tools.

Dataset X-Ray: behavioral analytics vs classic stats

Shield Analytics gives what every analytics dashboard gives: likes per post, views, engagement rate, follower growth, period comparison. Solid, but surface-level. LinkPost decodes your posts at a level no other tool reaches: business funnel mix (TOFU/MOFU/BOFU) per post, analysis of 100% of comments (sentiment, controversy, your audience's emotional response), identification of your real best post (1 user out of 3 discovers it's not what they thought), niche benchmark. The algorithm also PREDICTS the emotional response of your posts BEFORE publication. And the same depth applies to any LinkedIn creator via Spy Mode. Shield = stats. LinkPost = behavioral science.

LinkPost wins

Shield = clean analytics dashboard. LinkPost = behavioral science (TOFU/MOFU/BOFU + 100% comments + emotion prediction).

Competitor Spy Mode

Shield lets you track external accounts to compare your stats against your niche: you see their views, likes, growth. Useful but it stays at aggregate measurement. LinkPost does active decomposed monitoring: you pick a LinkedIn creator in your niche, we monitor them non-stop and surface their real controversy level, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU mix, most profitable topics, viral tactics, audience emotional response per post, best publishing days, whether they're in a POD, and the top 10 most engaged profiles around them. You don't just learn that a creator is crushing it. You learn WHY they're crushing it.

LinkPost wins

Shield = external aggregated tracking. LinkPost = tactical and behavioral decomposition per creator.

AI Strategist: 1 month of content in 2 clicks

Shield Analytics doesn't offer editorial planning. It's by design: Shield is a measurement tool, not a creation tool. LinkPost goes several levels further: you ask for your monthly editorial plan, the AI Strategist runs hundreds of parallel queries on its 1M+ post database, your personal history, and real-time industry news. Output: 30 posts built on what actually works in your niche, internally coherent, ready to publish. 1 post idea per day, a full month of structured editorial, in 2 clicks.

LinkPost wins

Shield doesn't cover this need. LinkPost goes from idea to full plan in 2 clicks.

Hooks and 33 measured tactics

Shield Analytics offers a few basic recommendations based on past performance ("your Tuesday posts perform better"). LinkPost goes several levels further: 33 measured virality tactics (22 attention tactics + 11 rules), organized in 7 categories (Attention, Rhythm, Engagement, Emotion, Credibility, Cognition, Distribution). For each tactic: examples from real high-performing LinkedIn posts, YOUR personal stats (how many of your posts use this tactic, your average likes with vs without), and the measured impact on your performance. The X-Ray mode in the editor points directly to each missed tactic while you write. Full public documentation: linkpost.gg/cheat-sheet.

LinkPost wins

Shield = aggregated recommendations. LinkPost = 33 measured tactics with personal stats and direct editor integration.

Scheduling and publishing

Shield Analytics isn't a native scheduling tool: you publish your posts elsewhere (LinkedIn directly, or via a third-party tool like Buffer/Taplio), then measure in Shield. LinkPost integrates a full calendar with publishing via the official LinkedIn API, multiple writing profiles, minute-precise scheduling, and editorial series management. You write, schedule, publish, measure — all in a single coherent tool.

LinkPost wins

Shield doesn't cover native scheduling. LinkPost = full end-to-end workflow.

Multi-account and agency management

Shield Analytics is very well-suited to ghostwriting agencies: Business plans let you track multiple LinkedIn client accounts, with aggregated reporting and export for client reports. It's one of Shield's strongest use cases. LinkPost integrates multiple writing profiles + unified calendar, but stays focused on content creation (not agency management). If your business model is managing 10-30 LinkedIn accounts for clients, Shield Business is better suited to the reporting workflow.

Shield Analytics wins

Shield wins on agency multi-client reporting. LinkPost suits 1-5 accounts in parallel.

[Personas · The right pick for your profile]

The right pick for your profile

LinkedIn creator who only wants a clean analytics dashboard

If you write your posts elsewhere (ChatGPT, Notion, LinkedIn editor) and your only need is a dashboard to track your stats and growth, Shield Analytics at $15/month is an excellent choice. Clean interface, reliable data, tidy reporting export. Don't pay €99/month for a tool you'll only use 20% of.

Recommendation[Shield Analytics]

B2B SaaS founder generating leads from content

A single viral post can bring you 5 to 15 demo requests. Measuring after the fact isn't enough: you want to know BEFORE publishing which of your 25 variants will hit. LinkPost generates 25 variants, tells you which one to publish, and learns your style. Over 90 days, the ROI of a single successful post pays for 6 months of subscription at €99/month.

Recommendation[LinkPost]

Coach or consultant scaling personal brand

You want to understand WHY your posts work to scale your output. Spy Mode on top creators in your niche, Dataset X-Ray on your own posts (TOFU/MOFU/BOFU + audience sentiment), AI Strategist for monthly planning. Shield shows you the numbers, LinkPost shows you the patterns behind the numbers and tells you how to reproduce them.

Recommendation[LinkPost]

Ghostwriting agency managing 10+ LinkedIn accounts

If your model is managing 10-30 LinkedIn accounts for clients and your primary need is multi-account analytics reporting (monthly client report, period aggregate, period comparison), Shield Business is the reference tool. LinkPost suits 1-5 accounts but loses the agency UX edge on reporting at scale.

Recommendation[Shield Analytics]
[Our verdict · Which one, really]

Final verdict

[Our pick · For LinkPost]

Pick LinkPost if you publish to drive business through inbound content, and every post matters. The difference with Shield is that we don't give you another dashboard, we generate 25 calibrated variants scored on 300+ factors before publication, we tell you which to publish, and we learn your style. It's analytics + prediction + generation + scheduling in a single coherent tool. On the 20 most active users: x1.93 likes over 60 days, x3 on their best post.

[For Shield Analytics]

Pick Shield Analytics if you only want a clean LinkedIn analytics dashboard, without content generation, predictive scoring or AI Strategist. It's one of the most mature tools on the market for measuring LinkedIn performance, particularly well-suited to ghostwriting agencies needing multi-client reporting. Starts at $15/month.

[FAQ · What people ask us]

Frequently asked questions

Is LinkPost at €99/month more expensive than Shield Analytics?
Yes, Shield Analytics starts at $15/month (Personal), significantly cheaper than LinkPost. But the two tools don't cover the same need: Shield is a LinkedIn analytics dashboard, LinkPost is a virality prediction + multi-variant generation + scheduling + analytics tool. If your need is only to measure after the fact, Shield is the right price/value ratio. If you publish to drive business through content, LinkPost's ROI is measurable (x1.93 likes over 60 days).
Does Shield generate content like LinkPost?
No. Shield Analytics is strictly an analytics tool, not a creation tool. You write your posts elsewhere (ChatGPT, Notion, LinkedIn editor) then measure them in Shield. LinkPost, conversely, generates 25 variants per topic and scores them on 300+ factors before publication. That's the structural gap between the two tools.
Isn't the 300+ factor scoring just marketing?
No. The V2 algorithm analyzes 300+ factors total, including 27 personalized on your history (vs 49 factors and 0 personal in V1). It's trained on 1M+ LinkedIn posts. Before/after measured results on the 20 most active users over 60 days: x1.93 likes on average, average best post goes from 78 to 237 likes (×3), 1 user out of 4 multiplies their record by 10+. Not marketing, measured numbers.
Does Shield Analytics offer a free trial?
Shield typically offers a free trial period. LinkPost doesn't have a full-product trial, but the Post Analyzer is free without signup at : paste a post, we score it on 300+ factors. To use LinkPost in full, sign up then pick a plan: €99/month or €790/year.
[Internal links · Keep going]

Related reading

  • Try the free Post Analyzer
  • LinkedIn study: 438,413 posts analyzed
  • LinkPost vs MagicPost
  • LinkPost vs Taplio
  • See all LinkPost plans

Welcome to the new era of content creation.

Try LinkPost now

"LinkPost outclasses every competitor by far. I've been training entrepreneurs for 8 years, and it catapults everything I know."

Jean-Marc Houel
Jean-Marc HouelTrains entrepreneurs · LinkPost user

Updated May 26, 2026·By Yannis Haismann·100% 5-star reviews on Trustpilot

Shield advantage: very low entry price ($15/month), clean analytics interface, perfect if your only need is a simple stats dashboard.
  • 4LinkPost advantage: deeper analytics than Shield on Shield's own turf, plus prediction before publication. x1.93 likes measured over 60 days, +71% posts that hit, -75% flops avoided. Plus AI generation, Spy Mode, AI Strategist, behavioral Dataset X-Ray.
  • 27
    89
    ×3.30
    3LP-0033.911.0×2.839149×16.56
    4LP-0048.520.7×2.4428461×16.46
    5LP-00528.970.0×2.4233822×24.91· Cohort record
    6LP-00623.549.8×2.1273159×2.18
    7LP-0072.55.1×2.04518×3.60
    8LP-0081.42.9×1.99739×5.57
    9LP-0097.715.3×1.9812751×0.40
    10LP-01014.027.3×1.9553163×3.08
    11LP-01127.352.8×1.946287×1.40
    12LP-0129.417.7×1.902941×1.41
    13LP-01339.673.3×1.85101156×1.54
    14LP-014199.8365.3×1.834871136×2.33
    15LP-01532.857.5×1.7556140×2.50
    16LP-01618.932.8×1.73135316×2.34
    17LP-01732.152.9×1.65111167×1.50
    18LP-0188.913.8×1.562883×2.96
    19LP-0199.815.1×1.542944×1.52
    20LP-02043.265.3×1.51115364×3.17

    [METHODOLOGY]Cohort: the 20 most active LinkPost users (measured by post volume) during the beta period, before the official public launch. No cherry-picking: top 20 by activity, not by results. For each user, we compare their average likes and record posts over the 60 days before they signed up to LinkPost vs the 60 days after signup. Identities anonymized (LP-001 to LP-020).

    linkpost.gg/post-analyzer
    Does LinkPost have an analytics dashboard as clean as Shield?
    Yes, and even deeper. Beyond classic stats (likes, views, engagement, follower growth), LinkPost adds Dataset X-Ray: TOFU/MOFU/BOFU funnel mix per post, analysis of 100% of comments, identification of your real best post, prediction of emotional response before publication. Shield is simpler to pick up if you only want classic numbers. LinkPost goes further if you want to understand the patterns behind.
    Can I migrate my Shield data to LinkPost?
    Nothing to migrate. LinkPost connects to your official LinkedIn account and analyzes your existing posts directly. No copy-paste, no manual import. Your writing profiles are automatically created from your last 100 published posts on LinkedIn.
    Is Shield French? And LinkPost?
    Shield Analytics is founded by Andreas Bornhäußer, team based in Germany. LinkPost is co-founded by Yannis Haismann in France (alongside LinkHub, LinkEarn and LinkMagnet in the same galaxy). Both are GDPR-compliant. Both use the official LinkedIn API.
    Should I leave Shield to switch to LinkPost?
    Depends on your usage. If you use Shield mainly for its multi-account analytics dashboard (agency workflow), keep Shield. If you're a solo creator and your real need is to increase your performance post by post (not just measure it), LinkPost replaces Shield and adds variant generation, predictive scoring, Spy Mode and AI Strategist.
    How does LinkPost factor in the new LinkedIn algorithm?
    LinkPost's virality prediction algorithm was designed building on LinkedIn Engineering's public research, notably the article "Engineering the next generation of LinkedIn's Feed" published by Hristo Danchev on March 12, 2026 (https://www.linkedin.com/blog/engineering/feed/engineering-the-next-generation-of-linkedins-feed). That paper details the transition to a unified feed via LLM embeddings, percentile bucketing of engagement signals (popularity-signal correlation ×30 per LinkedIn), temporal interaction sequences (Generative Recommender, transformer with causal attention), and the passive/active signal distinction. Our algorithm models exactly these signals: estimated dwell, passive/active mix, semantic structure, persona-specific temporal profile. That's what sets it apart from a plain LLM-as-a-judge based on grammar.