LinkPost
Login
LinkHub

LinkHub

Attract qualified clients on LinkedIn with your comments

LinkPost

LinkPost

Create viral LinkedIn content, scientifically

LinkEarn

LinkEarn

Win unlimited clients through LinkedIn — without spending hours on it.

LinkMagnet

LinkMagnet

Distribute your lead magnets automatically on LinkedIn

LinkPost

© 2026 LinkPost. All rights reserved.

See what others don't.

Features

AI post generatorVirality scoreAI LinkedIn coachMulti-source repurposingMCP integrationAI visualsLinkedIn analyticsContent calendarSpy modeViral inspirations

Free tools

LinkedIn Post AnalyzerLinkedIn Benchmark 2026Engagement Rate CalculatorHook GeneratorHeadline generatorHeadline examplesAbout generatorAbout examplesLinkedIn Profile CheckerViral rules & tacticsSecret AdmirersLinkedIn trends

Resources

BlogPlaybooksMonthly LinkedIn Benchmark

Comparisons

See all comparisonsLinkPost vs TaplioLinkPost vs MagicPostLinkPost vs AuthoredUp

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of Use

LinkPost is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by LinkedIn Corporation.

LinkPost

Have a question?

Mathilde is here to help

Hi!

I'm Mathilde from the LinkPost team. How can I help you?

Press Enter to send

Jérôme
Sofiane
Camille
Lucas
Sébastien
LinkPost: 100% 5-star reviews on Trustpilot

LinkPost vs PostWise: Which One Should You Choose in 2026?

Updated May 27, 2026·By Yannis Haismann

Honest comparison on 10 criteria: pricing, multi-platform, virality prediction, LinkedIn specialization. Clear verdict for your scope.

PostWise writes for 3 networks at the surface. LinkPost writes, scores and predicts virality on LinkedIn, in depth.

The honest comparison between LinkPost (€99/month, proprietary LinkedIn virality prediction algorithm, 1M+ posts analyzed) and PostWise ($37 Basic or $97/month Unlimited on annual commit, multi-platform X + LinkedIn + Threads). 10 scored criteria, clear verdict for your scope: one network deeply or three networks broadly.

PostWise writes for Twitter, LinkedIn and Threads from the same dashboard, with an AI trained on past viral posts and 9,000+ creators on board (Justin Welsh testimonial included). LinkPost does less broad: LinkedIn only. But on LinkedIn, we go further than anyone: proprietary algorithm scoring 300+ factors before publication, 25 variants generated per topic, 27 criteria learned on your style, aligned with LinkedIn Engineering's public research (March 2026). If you publish on 3 networks, PostWise. If LinkedIn is your funnel, LinkPost.

+1M X and LinkedIn posts
Predictive virality scoring
Generates 25 posts, picks the best
Try LinkPost now

"I'd tested plenty of other tools claiming to be similar to LinkPost and was always a bit disappointed. In 2 months, LinkPost let me generate as many likes as in the entire previous year."

Enzo Farné
Enzo FarnéLinkPost user · Trustpilot 5/5
[Quick answer]

The synthesis in 30 seconds

PostWise starts at $37/month (Basic, 400 AI credits, 5 accounts) and goes up to $97/month Unlimited billed annually (which means $1,164 charged at once). It generates content for Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads from one dashboard with a 7-day free trial. LinkPost costs €99/month but ships a proprietary LinkedIn-specific virality prediction algorithm: 300+ factors analyzed per post including 27 personalized on your style, 25 variants generated per topic, trained on 1M+ LinkedIn posts and aligned with LinkedIn Engineering's public research (March 2026) ↗. Measured result on the 20 most active users: x1.93 likes over 60 days.

Try the free Post Analyzer

[TL;DR · Pick your scenario]

Which one is for you?

For you if
  • LinkedIn is your main B2B acquisition channel
  • You want to know BEFORE publishing what will work
  • You want the most advanced tool on the market for LinkedIn
LinkPost
For you if
  • You publish on Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads in parallel
  • You're starting out and want an entry point at $37/month
  • You don't need a quantified virality prediction
PostWise

[Why one over the other?]

  • PostWise wins on entry price ($37/month) and multi-network coverage. Its AI has no quantified predictive scoring.
  • LinkPost wins on measured LinkedIn publishing quality (x1.93 likes / 60 days, +71% posts that hit, -75% flops avoided) at €99/month.

TL;DR

  1. 1PostWise is multi-platform: Twitter/X + LinkedIn + Threads from the same dashboard, ideal for creators publishing on 3 networks.
  2. 2LinkPost is LinkedIn-only but much deeper: a proprietary algorithm that predicts virality before publication and generates 25 scored variants per topic.
  3. 3PostWise wins on entry price ($37/month) and multi-network coverage. Its AI has no quantified predictive scoring.
  4. 4LinkPost wins on measured LinkedIn publishing quality (x1.93 likes / 60 days, +71% posts that hit, -75% flops avoided) at €99/month.
[Proof in numbers · Measured ROI]

What about ROI?

x1.93
likes over 60 days
Measured on LinkPost's 20 most active users, before/after
+71%
posts that hit
Across 50,000+ posts tested with the V2 algo
-75%
flops avoided
Weak posts detected before publication

[Cohort · 20 most active LinkPost users]

n=20 · 2026-05-22
Beta cohort raw data
#IDLikes/post beforeLikes/post after×AvgBest post beforeBest post after×Max
1LP-00119.170.2×3.6853248×4.68
2LP-0022.99.7×3.37

If your B2B funnel runs through LinkedIn, a viral post brings 1 to 3 qualified leads on average. PostWise Basic at $37/month gives you 400 AI credits and lets you write for 3 platforms without telling you which post will take off. LinkPost at €99/month generates 25 variants per topic, scores each on 300+ factors and tells you which one to publish on LinkedIn. PostWise Unlimited is $97/month but billed annually ($1,164 upfront), vs LinkPost at €99/month with no mandatory annual commitment. If LinkedIn is more than 50% of your acquisition, ROI tips fast.

Try the free Post Analyzer
[Comparison table · 10 criteria]

Comparison table

LinkPost vs PostWise · comparison over 10 criteria, scored out of 10
Criterion
LinkPost
PostWise
Entry price
6/10

€99/month or €790/year, single plan, no annual lock-in required

8/10

$37/mo Basic (400 AI credits, 5 accounts) · $97/mo Unlimited on annual commit ($1,164 upfront)

LinkedIn specialization
10/10

LinkedIn-only, algorithm calibrated on 1M+ LinkedIn posts

5/10

Multi-platform (Twitter/X + LinkedIn + Threads), generalist AI without explicit LinkedIn specialization, published by XO Labs Ltd

Multi-platform (X + LinkedIn + Threads)
0/10

No other platform, 100% LinkedIn focus

9/10

Single dashboard for 3 networks, automatic repurposing across platforms

Virality prediction before publication
9/10

300+ factors analyzed, 27 personal factors learned on your style

0/10

No quantified predictive scoring, AI trained on 'awesome posts' without a scoring grid

25-variant generation + scoring
10/10

25 different angles generated, each scored, you publish the best

4/10

One post at a time, viral post repurposing, no multi-variant scoring

LinkedIn competitor Spy Mode
9/10

Continuous per-creator monitoring: controversy, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU mix, POD, top fans

4/10

Viral post library for repurposing, no continuous per-creator monitoring

AI Strategist (monthly content plan)
9/10

1 month of posts built in 2 clicks, based on your stats + 1M+ posts + real-time news

5/10

Idea suggestions and templates, no auto-built monthly plan

Style personalization
9/10

27 personal factors learned automatically, multi writing profiles

6/10

Tone adaptation via prompts and examples, limited personal learning

Multi-source (YouTube, podcast, PDF, voice)
9/10

YouTube, podcast, article, PDF, image, voice note, raw thought

5/10

Repurposing from existing tweets and posts, limited external sources

LinkedIn Analytics (Dataset X-Ray)
9/10

Decodes your LinkedIn posts: funnel mix, real best post identified, niche benchmark

5/10

Simple multi-platform engagement tracking, no per-post LinkedIn scoring

[Breakdown · Feature by feature]

Feature-by-feature breakdown

LinkedIn in depth vs 3 platforms at the surface

PostWise is multi-platform: you write once and publish on Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads. Useful if you're active on all three. But the AI engine is generalist, designed to produce content that works across three very different algorithms. Twitter hooks don't work the same as LinkedIn hooks. Optimal timing isn't the same. Ideal length isn't the same. LinkedIn's algorithm (unified feed via LLM embeddings, passive vs active signals, percentile bucketing) is documented in LinkedIn Engineering's public research from March 2026 and has nothing to do with X's. LinkPost is LinkedIn-only and its algorithm is trained on 1M+ LinkedIn posts. It's the classic trade-off: a broad tool decent on 3 networks, or a narrow tool excellent on 1.

LinkPost wins

LinkPost wins on LinkedIn depth. PostWise wins if your scope is explicitly multi-platform.

Virality prediction before publication

It's the core of LinkPost V2. Before you click Publish, the algorithm analyzes your post on 300+ factors, including 27 learned on your past posts (average length, hook structure, question density, CTA types, emoji frequency, etc.). Not market averages. Your stats. Your patterns. Your best hooks. The algo also tells you what to fix: "Your hook caps at 0.6/1, replace with X." "Your closing line falls flat, here are 2 alternatives." "This hour loses you 40% of impressions in your niche." Trained on 1M+ LinkedIn posts and aligned with LinkedIn Engineering's public research ("Engineering the next generation of LinkedIn's Feed", Hristo Danchev, March 12, 2026: unified feed via LLM embeddings, Generative Recommender on temporal sequences, distinction between passive/active signals). PostWise doesn't offer quantified predictive scoring.

LinkPost wins

Feature absent from PostWise. The hardest gap to close between the two tools.

Multi-platform: Twitter/X + LinkedIn + Threads

This is where PostWise wins outright, and we have to be honest. If you actively publish on Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads, writing your content three times costs you time. PostWise auto-repurposes between platforms from one dashboard. You write an idea, you adapt it to each network's format, you schedule them in parallel. For a creator who needs to feed 3 audiences at once, it changes the game. LinkPost doesn't do that: we're 100% LinkedIn-focused, so no repurposing to X or Threads. If Twitter weighs as much as LinkedIn in your funnel, PostWise is the right tool.

PostWise wins

PostWise wins on multi-network scope. LinkPost only covers LinkedIn, in depth.

25-variant generation + scoring + best-pick

PostWise generates 1 post at a time and offers repurposing of existing viral posts. Enough to publish regularly. LinkPost works differently: you give an idea, we generate 25 variants calibrated on different angles (storytelling, controversy, data, expertise, punchy hook, emotional opener). Each variant is then scored on 300+ factors. You see immediately which one has the strongest probability of taking off. You publish that one. Science replaces intuition.

LinkPost wins

25 scored variants vs 1 post + manual variations. You publish the best, not the first draft.

Competitor Spy Mode

PostWise gives you a viral post library to inspire and repurpose. Useful for one-off ideas. LinkPost does continuous monitoring: you pick a LinkedIn creator in your niche, we monitor them non-stop and surface their real controversy level, TOFU/MOFU/BOFU mix, most profitable topics, viral tactics, audience emotional response per post, best publishing days, whether they're in a POD, and the top 10 most engaged profiles around them. Each post is scored. You copy. You adapt. You publish with a step ahead.

LinkPost wins

PostWise = passive inspiration database. LinkPost = active per-creator monitoring.

AI Strategist: 1 month of content in 2 clicks

PostWise suggests ideas via its viral post library and lets you write. LinkPost goes further: you ask for your monthly editorial plan, the AI Strategist runs hundreds of parallel queries on its 1M+ post DB, your personal history, and real-time industry news. Output: 30 posts built on what actually works in your LinkedIn niche, internally coherent, ready to publish. 1 post idea per day, a full month of structured editorial, in 2 clicks.

LinkPost wins

Full LinkedIn strategy vs inspiration library to dig through manually.

Pricing structure

PostWise displays $37/month Basic (400 AI credits, 6 months scheduling, 5 accounts) and $97/month Unlimited. But Unlimited is "billed annually", so an annual commit is required: you pay $1,164 upfront for the year. A monthly-without-commit option isn't publicly advertised, and the Basic → Unlimited jump is steep. LinkPost has a single plan at €99/month or €790/year, with no mandatory annual commit on monthly. Easier to arbitrate.

LinkPost wins

PostWise forces annual commit for Unlimited ($1,164 upfront). LinkPost lets you pick monthly or yearly.

Post scheduling

Both tools publish via official APIs. PostWise schedules on Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads from the same calendar, with 6 months of scheduling horizon on Basic. LinkPost integrates scheduling into a full LinkedIn editorial calendar with preview and recurrences. For pure LinkedIn, both do the job day-to-day. If you schedule in parallel across 3 networks, PostWise is more efficient on this criterion.

Tie

Tie if you only publish on LinkedIn. PostWise wins if you schedule multi-platform.

[Personas · The right pick for your profile]

The right pick for your profile

Creator active on Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads

If you publish seriously on all three networks and your time is scarce, PostWise saves you hours by auto-repurposing your content between platforms. At $37/month Basic, it's a reasonable investment to cover 3 funnels. You won't have predictive scoring for LinkedIn, but if your audience is split between X and LinkedIn, the arbitrage favors PostWise.

Recommendation[PostWise]

B2B SaaS founder with LinkedIn at 70% of acquisition

A single viral LinkedIn post can bring you 5 to 15 demo requests. You don't have time to publish blind. LinkPost generates 25 variants, tells you which one will land, and you publish that one. Over 90 days, the ROI of a single successful post pays for 6 months of subscription at €99/month. Twitter and Threads are secondary for you: a multi-platform PostWise would be overkill mis-calibrated on LinkedIn.

Recommendation[LinkPost]

Solopreneur starting out with a budget under €50/month

If your content budget is tight and you just want to start publishing regularly on LinkedIn (and a bit on X), PostWise Basic at $37/month is a decent entry point. You pay in USD so FX matters, but it stays under the effective €50 mark. You won't have virality prediction, but at this maturity level, the challenge is more about building the publishing habit than optimizing every post. You'll upgrade to LinkPost when every post starts mattering for business.

Recommendation[PostWise]

French-speaking creator focused on LinkedIn B2B

PostWise is in English and calibrated on US creator content (Justin Welsh testimonial included). To publish in French on LinkedIn, the predictive algorithm isn't tuned to your voice. LinkPost is co-founded by Yannis Haismann in France, the algorithm is trained on 1M+ posts including a significant French share, the UI is native FR/EN, and so is support. If French LinkedIn B2B is your turf, LinkPost gets you further faster.

Recommendation[LinkPost]
[Our verdict · Which one, really]

Final verdict

[Our pick · For LinkPost]

Pick LinkPost if LinkedIn is your main B2B acquisition channel and you want to maximize every post. The difference with PostWise is that we don't hand you an idea to write for 3 networks: we generate 25 variants calibrated on LinkedIn, scored on 300+ factors, and tell you which one will land. Science replaces intuition. On the 20 most active users: x1.93 likes over 60 days, x3 on best post, +71% posts that hit. Single plan at €99/month with no mandatory annual commit.

[For PostWise]

Pick PostWise if you actively publish on Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads in parallel and want one tool to repurpose your content across the three networks. At $37/month Basic it's a decent entry point for solopreneurs starting out. It's the most relevant tool on the market for this multi-platform scope. Note that Unlimited at $97/month requires an annual commit ($1,164 upfront), and no quantified predictive scoring is offered.

[FAQ · What people ask us]

Frequently asked questions

Is LinkPost at €99/month more expensive than PostWise at $37?
Yes on the entry plan. PostWise Basic is $37/month (400 AI credits, 5 accounts), LinkPost is €99/month. But PostWise writes for 3 networks (X, LinkedIn, Threads) without predictive scoring. LinkPost focuses on LinkedIn with a proprietary algorithm scoring 300+ factors. The right arbitrage depends on your scope: if you publish on 3 networks, PostWise's cost per network is unbeatable. If LinkedIn weighs 70%+ of your acquisition, cost per lead generated tips toward LinkPost (x1.93 likes over 60 days measured on 20 users).
PostWise is multi-platform, isn't that necessarily better?
Not if LinkedIn is your main channel. PostWise's AI engine is generalist: it aims to produce content usable across Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads. But the three networks' algorithms have nothing in common: different hook structures, different ideal lengths, different relevance signals. LinkedIn Engineering published the details of its new feed in March 2026 (LLM embeddings, percentile bucketing, temporal sequences) which is very specific. A multi-platform tool does decent on 3 networks; a LinkedIn-only tool trained on 1M+ LinkedIn posts does excellent on 1.
PostWise has a 7-day free trial, doesn't LinkPost?
Correct, PostWise offers a 7-day free trial. LinkPost doesn't have a full-product trial, but the Post Analyzer is free without signup at linkpost.gg/post-analyzer: paste a LinkedIn post, we score it on 300+ factors. To use LinkPost in full, sign up then pick a plan: €99/month or €790/year.
[Internal links · Keep going]

Related reading

  • Try the free Post Analyzer
  • LinkedIn study: 438,413 posts analyzed
  • LinkPost vs MagicPost
  • LinkPost vs Taplio
  • See all LinkPost plans

Welcome to the new era of content creation.

Try LinkPost now

"LinkPost outclasses every competitor by far. I've been training entrepreneurs for 8 years, and it catapults everything I know."

Jean-Marc Houel
Jean-Marc HouelTrains entrepreneurs · LinkPost user

Updated May 27, 2026·By Yannis Haismann·100% 5-star reviews on Trustpilot

27
89
×3.30
3LP-0033.911.0×2.839149×16.56
4LP-0048.520.7×2.4428461×16.46
5LP-00528.970.0×2.4233822×24.91· Cohort record
6LP-00623.549.8×2.1273159×2.18
7LP-0072.55.1×2.04518×3.60
8LP-0081.42.9×1.99739×5.57
9LP-0097.715.3×1.9812751×0.40
10LP-01014.027.3×1.9553163×3.08
11LP-01127.352.8×1.946287×1.40
12LP-0129.417.7×1.902941×1.41
13LP-01339.673.3×1.85101156×1.54
14LP-014199.8365.3×1.834871136×2.33
15LP-01532.857.5×1.7556140×2.50
16LP-01618.932.8×1.73135316×2.34
17LP-01732.152.9×1.65111167×1.50
18LP-0188.913.8×1.562883×2.96
19LP-0199.815.1×1.542944×1.52
20LP-02043.265.3×1.51115364×3.17

[METHODOLOGY]Cohort: the 20 most active LinkPost users (measured by post volume) during the beta period, before the official public launch. No cherry-picking: top 20 by activity, not by results. For each user, we compare their average likes and record posts over the 60 days before they signed up to LinkPost vs the 60 days after signup. Identities anonymized (LP-001 to LP-020).

Is PostWise really built for LinkedIn or for Twitter?
Both officially. PostWise is published by XO Labs Ltd and its AI is designed to work across Twitter/X, LinkedIn and Threads from a single generation engine. LinkedIn support is real, cross-platform repurposing works, but the algorithm isn't calibrated on LinkedIn-specific algorithm features (passive signals, dwell, temporal sequences documented by LinkedIn Engineering in March 2026). For pure LinkedIn use, LinkPost is more technically aligned.
Isn't LinkPost's 300+ factor scoring just marketing?
No. The V2 algorithm analyzes 300+ factors total, including 27 personalized on your history (vs 49 factors and 0 personal in V1). It's trained on 1M+ LinkedIn posts. Before/after measured results on the 20 most active users over 60 days: x1.93 likes on average, average best post goes from 78 to 237 likes (×3), 1 user out of 4 multiplies their record by 10+. Not marketing, measured numbers.
Justin Welsh endorses PostWise — isn't that more credible than LinkPost?
Justin Welsh is an excellent LinkedIn creator (ironically, since he endorses a multi-platform tool of Twitter origin). His testimonial confirms that PostWise writes posts that land. He doesn't say PostWise predicts virality or scores each post. LinkPost relies on public Trustpilot reviews (100% 5-star) and on numbers measured on its beta cohort (x1.93 likes over 60 days). The two signals don't compare directly: an individual endorsement from a single creator vs a series of verifiable user reviews and quantified data.
What's the real concrete difference between the two?
PostWise = 3 platforms at the surface (Twitter/X + LinkedIn + Threads), generalist AI trained on viral posts, cross-network repurposing, $37 → $97/month. LinkPost = LinkedIn in depth, proprietary algorithm predicting virality before publication, 25 scored variants per post, per-creator Spy Mode, AI Strategist for your monthly plan, €99/month. PostWise is a multi-network Swiss knife. LinkPost is a LinkedIn precision tool.
Are PostWise and LinkPost French?
PostWise is published by XO Labs Ltd (international team). LinkPost is co-founded by Yannis Haismann and Matteo Kocken from Estonia (Incomparable OÜ entity), with LinkHub, LinkEarn and LinkMagnet in the same galaxy. UI and support natively FR + EN on LinkPost. Both are GDPR-compliant. Both publish via the official APIs.
How does LinkPost factor in the new LinkedIn algorithm?
LinkPost's virality prediction algorithm was designed building on LinkedIn Engineering's public research, notably the article "Engineering the next generation of LinkedIn's Feed" published by Hristo Danchev on March 12, 2026 (https://www.linkedin.com/blog/engineering/feed/engineering-the-next-generation-of-linkedins-feed). That paper details the transition to a unified feed via LLM embeddings, percentile bucketing of engagement signals (popularity-signal correlation ×30 per LinkedIn), temporal interaction sequences (Generative Recommender, transformer with causal attention), and the passive/active signal distinction. Our algorithm models exactly these signals: estimated dwell, passive/active mix, semantic structure, persona-specific temporal profile. That's what sets it apart from a generalist LLM-as-a-judge that doesn't distinguish LinkedIn from other networks.